Hendrycks proposes deterrence and nonproliferation for superintelligence
Hendrycks, Eric Schmidt, and Alexandr Wang propose a strategy combining deterrence against destabilizing AI projects, controls on chips and model weights, technical misuse safeguards, legal rules for agents, and measures to limit automation-driven instability.
0 comments · 0 votes
Sign in to join the discussion →
No comments yet. Start the discussion.
Why it moved the index
The proposal adds specific international-control mechanisms for advanced AI, including compute tracking, model-weight security and deterrence, but their effectiveness and escalation risks remain untested policy judgments.
Assessment history
-
R1
Away 22 · confidence 58
Initial inclusion from a fully read first-person policy synthesis with mechanisms distinct from Hendrycks's earlier risk taxonomy.
13 Aug 2026
Share this page
-
DoomBench assesses “Hendrycks proposes deterrence and nonproliferation for superintelligence” as evidence moving away from doom, with magnitude 22 and confidence 58 out of 100 in the governance and control category.
-
The DoomBench assessment of “Hendrycks proposes deterrence and nonproliferation for superintelligence” is based on reporting from Center for AI Safety and records the editorial rationale, source quality, attribution, and revision history.
-
DoomBench summarizes “Hendrycks proposes deterrence and nonproliferation for superintelligence” as follows: Hendrycks, Eric Schmidt, and Alexandr Wang propose a strategy combining deterrence against destabilizing AI projects, controls...
https://www.doombench.com/news/hendrycks-proposes-deterrence-and-nonproliferation-for-superintelligence-2025-03-06