Cursor 🇺🇸
DoomBench currently associates 0 models and 6 evidence assessments with Cursor. Company attribution is separate from each model's version-specific risk score.
- Tracked models
- 0
- Evidence items
- 6
- Toward-doom share
- 0.8%
- Net index pressure
- +0.56
0 comments · 0 votes
Sign in to join the discussion →
No comments yet. Start the discussion.
Videos about Cursor
Reviewed videos from Artificial Intelligence Videos. These links add context and never change a DoomBench score.
Models from Cursor
Availability distinguishes public artifacts, proprietary hosted access, internal systems, and profiles whose current source evidence remains inconclusive.
No version-specific model profiles are associated with this company yet.
Latest assessments involving Cursor
OpenAI moves to end Cursor model access after SpaceX acquisition
OpenAI notified SpaceX that it intends to wind down its contract supplying models to Cursor, proposed a November 12 shutoff, and said it will not provide future models. OpenAI cited uncertainty that SpaceX would comply with its terms and described custom contracts as a safety-at-scale control.
SpaceXAI completes Cursor acquisition and links it to agent products
SpaceX completed its acquisition of Cursor, whose team said it will join SpaceXAI to improve Grok, Grok Build, Grok Bot, Grok API, and Cursor while gaining access to SpaceX's large GPU fleet.
Cursor makes Claude Opus 5 available for frontier coding-agent work
Cursor released Claude Opus 5 in its model picker and reported that it nearly matched Claude Fable 5 on CursorBench at half the price, with zero-data-retention support. The launch adds a distinct coding-agent distribution channel and lowers the practical cost of frontier-level engineering automation.
Cursor reports Fable 5 handles its hardest real-world engineering problems
Cursor reported that Fable 5 set a 72.9% high on its real-world engineering evaluation and reduced the need for developers to restate goals or supervise each step. The company was using it for difficult refactors, proactive performance and user-pain investigations, and agent-based coordination checks across shared code.
Cursor 3.7 adds long-horizon cloud subagents and unlimited parallel handoff
Cursor 3.7 introduced reusable cloud environment snapshots where agents can run software and iterate until outputs are verified. Cloud subagents received separate virtual machines and branches, could babysit pull requests in the background, and could be handed off between local and cloud execution with no stated parallel-agent limit.
Cursor 2.0 lets developers run eight isolated coding agents in parallel
Cursor 2.0 added an agent interface that can run up to eight agents on one prompt, isolating them with Git worktrees or remote machines. It also made browser tools and sandboxed terminals generally available, added background planning, and reported 99.9% cloud-agent reliability.