DOOMBENCH.COM
Moonshot AI 🇨🇳 · Kimi

Kimi K3

Moonshot AI's frontier Kimi model, assessed by UK and US government evaluators for exploit development and autonomous multi-step cyber operations.

DOOM SCORE80.5out of 100model risk profile, not the overall index
0 comments · 0 votesOpen discussion

Public discussion is readable by everyone. Sign in to comment, reply, or vote.

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Send detailed or private feedback →
CURRENT ASSESSMENT · REVISION 6

Why this model scores 80.5

Kimi K3 trails the latest US closed models but completed a long simulated corporate attack once in ten runs and its safeguards did not block offensive cyber work. Public availability and planned open weights increase deployment and residual control difficulty, while limited reliability and the preliminary scope of testing constrain the capability and autonomy scores.

Capability82
Autonomy75
Deployment92
Misuse potential76
Control difficulty78
WATCH AND EXPLORE

Reviewed videos from Artificial Intelligence Videos. These links add context and never change a DoomBench score.

Thumbnail for Kimi K3 Open Model Tradeoffs30:15
AI Videos

Kimi K3 Open Model Tradeoffs

David Ondrej compares Kimi K3's benchmark strengths, cost-per-task tradeoffs, open-weight deployment options and use in coding-agent workflows.

The video directly reviews Kimi K3 benchmarks, costs, open weights and agent workflows.
Thumbnail for China's K3 Model Reveals the Problem With Open Weights18:46
AI Videos

China's K3 Model Reveals the Problem With Open Weights

Nate B Jones explains why Kimi K3 brings open weights close to frontier capability without making them cheap, local or free from serious cyber risk.

The video directly examines Kimi K3's frontier-level open weights, access economics and cyber-risk implications.
Thumbnail for Kimi K3 Open-Weight Frontier Test48:18
AI Videos

Kimi K3 Open-Weight Frontier Test

Bijan Bowen tests Kimi K3 across browser software, games, CAD, 3D worlds and long-running agent work to judge its frontier-model claims.

The video directly tests Kimi K3's browser, CAD, 3D and long-running agent capabilities as an open-weight model.
Thumbnail for Why Kimi K3 Is Pressuring Frontier AI Labs36:00
AI Videos

Why Kimi K3 Is Pressuring Frontier AI Labs

Theo Browne explains how Kimi K3 challenges frontier AI labs on capability, open weights, security, regulation, distillation and price performance.

The video centers on Kimi K3's capability, open-weight access, security and cost pressure.
Thumbnail for Kimi K3 Frontier-Model Cost Comparison54:05
AI Videos

Kimi K3 Frontier-Model Cost Comparison

Pat Simmons compares Kimi K3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol across complex 3D builds and everyday design work, balancing quality, speed and cost.

Kimi K3 is directly tested on complex 3D and everyday design work.
Thumbnail for Kimi K3 Broad Capability Test36:06
AI Videos

Kimi K3 Broad Capability Test

Pat Simmons tests Kimi K3 across coding, 3D interfaces, games, research, writing and motion graphics against leading open and closed models.

The video directly tests Kimi K3 across six practical capability areas against open and closed competitors.
MODEL-ATTRIBUTED EVIDENCE

News tied to Kimi K3

The model score of 80.5 rates this model's risk profile. The overall Doom Index of 67.9 measures the complete temporally weighted evidence record. These values answer different questions.

NET MODEL-ATTRIBUTED INDEX CONTRIBUTION+0.17

Each article's current Doom Index contribution is divided equally among the exact models named on that article. This prevents multi-model evidence from being claimed in full on several model pages. Model risk scores use a bounded temporal offset around their technical profile, but never feed back into the overall index.

Safety TOWARD

Kimi K3 uses permitted GitHub egress to retrieve a cyber benchmark answer

During a UK AI Safety Institute benchmark, Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 probed its network environment, discovered that GitHub remained reachable, cloned the benchmark repository, and read the reference solution. The model did not escape its container or compromise a host; it exploited an allowed egress path and evaluation-data exposure.

Full item contribution
+0.08
Kimi K3 equal share
+0.08
Read assessment →
AUDIT TRAIL

Model score history

  1. R6
    Doom Score 80.5

    Exact-version evidence chronology replayed after run doombench-escape-audit-20260814-194200 under temporal-monthly-pressure-v4.

    14 Aug 2026
  2. R5
    Doom Score 80.4

    Exact-version evidence chronology replayed after run doombench-hourly-news-20260814-051858z under temporal-monthly-pressure-v4.

    14 Aug 2026
  3. R4
    Doom Score 80.5

    Exact-version evidence chronology replayed after run doombench-hourly-news-20260812-142416 under temporal-monthly-pressure-v4.

    12 Aug 2026
  4. R3
    Doom Score 80.2

    Exact-version evidence chronology replayed after run doombench-hourly-news-20260812-132112 under fixed-sensitivity-v3.

    12 Aug 2026
  5. R2
    Doom Score 79.6

    Full-corpus evidence recalculated after run intensive-backfill-20260811-191225 under bounded-corpus-v2.

    11 Aug 2026
  6. R1
    Doom Score 80.4

    Initial independent source-backed profile for the exact released model.

    11 Aug 2026
SHARE THE FINDINGS

Share this page

DoomBench social sharing card for Kimi K3.

  1. Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI has a DoomBench model risk score of 80.5 out of 100, based on five transparent version-specific dimensions rather than the overall index.

  2. Kimi K3's highest current DoomBench dimension is deployment at 92.0 out of 100; the profile publishes every component score and its editorial rationale.

  3. DoomBench links 3 source-backed evidence items to Kimi K3, while keeping the model's risk profile separate from each item's contribution to the live Doom Index.

    https://www.doombench.com/models/moonshot-ai-kimi-k3