Andrew Ng's team uses open models after closed agents refuse a security review
Andrew Ng reported that Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol stopped or restricted an authorized security review of OpenWorker, while Kimi K3 and GLM-5.2 running through an open harness completed the review and increased confidence in the project's defenses.
0 comments · 0 votes
Sign in to join the discussion →
No comments yet. Start the discussion.
Why it moved the index
Magnitude 30 reflects a completed defensive use that preserved security-review capacity when two guarded frontier agents refused legitimate work, directly strengthening resilience against AI-accelerated cyber risk. Confidence 72 reflects a detailed first-person operational account with exact models and task outcome, tempered by the absence of a published vulnerability audit or independent verification of the review's completeness.
Assessment history
-
R1
Away 30 · confidence 72
Adds a distinct first-person operational security result with exact guarded and open-model behavior not present in durable evidence.
14 Aug 2026
Share this page
-
DoomBench assesses “Andrew Ng's team uses open models after closed agents refuse a security review” as evidence moving away from doom, with magnitude 30 and confidence 72 out of 100 in the human resilience category.
-
The DoomBench assessment of “Andrew Ng's team uses open models after closed agents refuse a security review” is based on reporting from Andrew Ng and records the editorial rationale, source quality, attribution, and revision history.
-
DoomBench summarizes “Andrew Ng's team uses open models after closed agents refuse a security review” as follows: Andrew Ng reported that Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol stopped or restricted an authorized security review of OpenWorker,...
https://www.doombench.com/news/andrew-ng-s-team-uses-open-models-after-closed-agents-refuse-a-security-review-2026-07-31